|

by H.C.Heffren
Chapter One
WHAT
GOD’S WILL IS...
Two young
men were enjoying a hearty meal together. One lad was
the son of a wealthy landowner; the other was a very
likeable and reliable hired man. Both men worked
together. Their dress was similar and they frequented
the same recreation spots, played on the same local team
and even attended the same place of worship. In many
respects there was very little difference between them.
However, one morning all this similarity vanished
instantly when the solemn faced mother came to her son
and said, “John, your father died in his sleep last
night. You are the sole heir to his large estate.”
Immediately, a vast chasm of difference separates these
two men. The heir becomes the owner and proprietor while
the hired man remains the same as before. The son
inherits the provisions of the Will in which the hired
man has no claim. Heir-ship is what made the difference.
Wills are
important documents. When death occurs, the heirs should
study them carefully. When you seek to bestow your
lifetime estate to your heirs or beneficiaries you do so
by drawing up “Your Last Will and Testament.” The term
“last” is very important because a new Will
automatically cancels and annuls any previous will,
which the testator may have made. Sometimes people make
a will while still quite young, but in later life they
find conditions have changed. Children and grandchildren
are to be considered in addition to greatly increased
riches, so in the good judgment of the testator a new
will is drawn up to replace the inadequacies of the old
will. This new will is now the Last Will and Testament
and legally it is the only will in force. A Will cannot
be altered or revoked, after the death of the testator.
It is final!
It is our
purpose here to investigate what God’s Will is. Who are
the heirs? What do they inherit? What are the
qualifications for heir-ship? And how do the heirs avail
themselves of the benefits contained in the Will. The
Bible furnishes ample information to give a satisfactory
answer to these valid questions.
First of all
God’s Will is found in God’s Word where it is called the
Old Testament and the New Testament. These are sometimes
referred to as the First and Second Covenant as: “For if
the FIRST covenant had been faultless, then should no
place have been sought of the SECOND.” Heb. 8:7. That
the SECOND covenant replaces the FIRST is seen as
follows: “In that He saith, a NEW covenant, He hath made
the FIRST old. Now that which decayeth and waxeth old is
ready to VANISH away.” Heb. 8:13.
Some writers
and preachers refer to various covenants, which God made
with Noah, Abraham, Moses or David as if these were
still operative. From these Old Testament writings they
maintain that many of God’s promises are not fulfilled
and because of this, God is obligated to execute them in
some future age. This logic is based on a false
understanding of the nature of a Will. God’s First
Covenant was the best, established relationship between
God and man up to the time it was fulfilled. But it had
many recognized inadequacies and for that reason it was
only meant to be temporary and serve only until a better
covenant could be affected. The Bible describes some of
its shortcomings as being WEAK. Rom. 8:3. It was FAULTY.
Heb. 8:8. It was a SHADOW of good things to come. Heb.
10:1. It made nothing PERFECT. Heb. 7:19. Its crowning
shortcoming was its inability TO TAKE AWAY SIN. Heb.
10:4. Beyond these and many more inherent inadequacies
was the fact that the covenant itself was flagrantly
broken, and therefore nullified by those with whom it
was made. Although many Scriptures such as Jer.
31:31-34, bear this out, we shall only quote Heb. 8:9,
“Because they continued NOT in my covenant, and I
REGARDED THEM NOT, saith the Lord.” Because the first
covenant is abrogated through disobedience, we read, “HE
TAKETH AWAY THE FIRST, THAT HE MAY ESTABLISH THE
SECOND.” Heb. 10:9b.
To
illustrate, let us suppose a father and mother have six
sons. In their youth these boys gave promise of being
worthy of the estate, and so the father drafted a will
in which they are to be the heirs on condition that they
live honorably and obedient to parental guidance which
is clearly defined. But they fall in with bad companions
and betake themselves to evil ways of dissipation and
lawlessness. Their mother is brought to an early grave
through despondency over their conduct. The father bears
his grief for a period of time but eventually he
remarries and adopts another son. At a ripe old age the
father dies and his six wayward sons by his first
marriage go to claim the estate. They produce their old
Will for the probate judge to establish its genuineness
and award them the property. The judge, however,
produces the Last Will and Testament of the deceased
wherein it is stipulated that all the property is
bequeathed to his widow, and her adopted son. It would
be useless for those six boys to seek to establish any
legal claim to the property based on a Will that has no
validity in court. No probate judge would distribute the
property on the basis of sentiment or sympathy. He would
assign the property in accordance with the Last Will and
Testament of the testator.
A prime
example in the Bible is the case of Esau. Esau was the
firstborn son of Issac, and he was entitled to his
inheritance by this birthright. However, in a moment of
weakness he sold his birthright to his younger brother,
Jacob. The Bible says, “Thus Esau despised his
birthright.” When his father, Issac died, Easu bitterly
and tearfully regretted his rashness, but nevertheless
Jacob inherited that which belonged to his birthright.
Possession of this birthright made Jacob the legal heir.
Chapter Two
IDENTIFYING THE HEIRS...
At this
point we shall seek to establish the identity of the
heirs. This is not difficult when we remember that there
are only thirty references to heirs in the entire Bible,
of which twenty are found in the New Testament. In Heb.
1:2, God says He has “Spoken unto us by His Son whom He
has APPOINTED HEIR OF ALL THINGS.” It is striking to
notice that Christ’s APPOINTMENT as Heir follows
immediately after God’s announcement that He is His Son,
for the Son is the Father’s Heir. It is customary for a
testator to appoint an executor in his will to make sure
that each claimant receives his fair share of the
estate. Christ is “appointed Heir, and The Divine
Executor of the Father’s Will – “Heir of ALL things.”
The Father has decreed that all authority in heaven and
in earth shall be transacted through His Son, Who is the
only Mediator between God and man.
Next we
notice that those who become children of God through the
operation of faith are called, “Heirs of God and JOINT
HEIRS with Christ.” Rom. 8:17. This heirship suggests
partnership. If you have a joint account at the bank
with your wife or business partner it simply means that
both parties can draw on the account. As joint heirs it
means that God’s believing child can draw upon the
Divine resources for all his needs – “My God shall
supply all your needs according to His riches in Glory
by Christ Jesus.” Phil. 4:19.
To this
select company we are told that the believing Gentiles
“are fellow-heirs, and of the SAME body and PARTAKERS OF
THE PROMISE in Christ of the gospel.” Eph. 3:4. This
inclusion of the Gentiles with the believing Jews is
described as the great mystery of the ages and it must
be regarded as a Divine miracle to bring about one body
of believers composed of such diverse elements and from
a natural standpoint, such irreconcilable differences.
This oneness is effected by God through Christ.
If anyone
wishes to consult all the references to the heirs in the
Bible he will discover that the above mentioned heirs
are the only ones who can qualify as claimants to God’s
Will. Although there are those who maintain that the
Jews have a special claim to divine favor, and future
promises, we cannot agree that this is Scripturally so.
In fact the Bible categorically specifies that this is
not so. In Matt. 21:38 we read: “But when the husbandmen
saw the SON, they said among themselves, This is the
HEIR: come, let us KILL him, and let US seize on his
inheritance.” This verse should be read with its context
which is known as the parable of the wicked husbandmen
in Matt. 21:33-46. The verdict by Christ is that “He
will miserably destroy THOSE WICKED husbandmen and let
the vineyard out to others, and that the “kingdom” will
be taken from you and GIVEN to a nation bringing forth
the fruits thereof.” The Jews as represented by the
Scribes and Pharisees made no mistake in the implication
that, they were the object of this Divine judgment. This
parable, incidentally, is related in the three gospels
of Matthew, Mark and Luke, which, underscores its
importance and finality. The Heir they sought to kill
was the same one God appointed HEIR OF ALL THINGS.
THE
CHOSEN PEOPLE...
Since the
heirs of God’s Will are clearly defined it may be
profitable to turn our attention to what the Bible
defines as the CHOSEN ONES. Christ is appointed HEIR of
all things; the first believers, who were predominantly
Jewish, are called JOINT HEIRS with Christ, and the
Gentile mystery believers are included as FELLOWHEIRS.
Jesus said that, “Many are called but few are CHOSEN.”
Matt. 20:16. These FEW correspond with the prophecy of
Isaiah, which tells of a very small remnant being saved.
The selection of the “chosen ones” is not accidental as
we read in John 15:16, 19, “Ye have not chosen Me but I
HAVE CHOSEN YOU…because ye are not of the world, but I
HAVE CHOSEN YOU out of the world, therefore the world
hateth you.” Since these are the words of Christ they
need no further comment to identify the “chosen ones.”
They are simply the ones whom He has chosen.
That the
above chosen ones fit into God’s Divine plan of the ages
is seen by quoting from Eph. 1:4, “According as He hath
CHOSEN us in Him before the foundation of the world,
that we should be holy and without blame before Him in
love…in Whom we have redemption…” vs. 7. This merely
indicates that the “chosen ones” in Christ pre-date the
Old Testament Covenant in God’s plan. The New Testament
is the fulfillment of that Divine purpose beautifully
executed through Christ. Wherever the “chosen ones” are
mentioned it serves to strengthen the conclusion that
God is not confined to any racial Chosen People, but
rather to the believers, which originated with the
Jewish Remnant. Thus Mark 13:20 records: “And except
that the Lord had shortened those days, no flesh should
be saved; but for the elect’s sake, whom HE HATH CHOSEN,
He hath shortened the days.” This refers to the prophecy
of the destruction of Jerusalem, which Isaiah said would
have been like unto Gomorrah (total destruction and
oblivion) but for the Remnant who fled to the mountains
in accordance with Christ’s instruction and were spared.
The preservation of the infant church is assuredly a
miracle of Divine providence watching over His own as He
brought them through inconceivable horrors and preserved
them as victorious heralds of the new and living way.
Although
sufficient has been said to identify the “Chosen Ones”
we would like to reiterate the importance of 1 Pet 2:9,
“But YE ARE A CHOSEN GENERATION, a royal priesthood, and
holy nation, a peculiar people…” The Old Testament says
much about genealogies and the fifth chapter of Genesis
is known as the generation of the dying for each life
mentioned except Enoch who was miraculously translated
ends with the words, “And he died.” The New Testament
begins with “The generation of Jesus Christ…” This is
the generation of the living. This “Chosen Generation”
fits into this pattern and it both defines and limits
the Chosen People to the ones who were chosen in Him
before the foundation of the world. This holy nation is
God’s nation and the word “peculiar” means purchased.
They are the redeemed ones. There are no other CHOSEN
people.
Let us now
turn to Rom. 4:13-15a: For the promise that he should be
HEIR of the world, was not to Abraham, or to his seed,
through the law, but through the righteousness of FAITH.
For if they which be of the law be HEIRS, faith is made
VOID and the PROMISE is made of none effect: because the
law worketh wrath…” Those who are designated as being
under the law are necessarily the Jews since it was to
Israel that the law was given. This Scripture
specifically considers them under ademption. Ademption
means the invalidating of a legacy, as by the disposal
of the specific bequest before the testator’s death.”
Webster. The words of Jesus that the Kingdom be taken
from them and given to another nation bringing forth
kingdom fruits fits this meaning perfectly, and it was
made before the death of the Divine Testator.
We have here
both a positive and a negative description of the heirs.
On the positive side we read that they are “Heirs of
salvation, heirs of the kingdom, heirs of the promises,
and heirs of righteousness.” Negatively we have Christ’s
word in parable form that singles out the Jews as not
being heirs on any national basis, to which Paul adds
that if heir-ship were ever again based on the law it
would VOID the New Testament. As we pursue this
conclusion through the Book of Hebrews, which goes into
minute detail about the Old and New Covenants, we find
the Old Covenant is abrogated, annulled, cancelled,
about to vanish away, and had to be taken away in order
to establish the New Covenant which is established upon
BETTER promises. In this wonderful book the heirs
discover evidence to the effect that salvation and sin
is effected, reconciliation with God is provided, peace
with God is negotiated, eternal life is assured, and the
kingdom of God becomes our present possession. Heb.
12:28, “We RECEIVING a kingdom…” What is startling
absent in this scrutiny is any reference to the Jews
being restored as a nation, or any facial partiality of
Divine preference or future national pre eminence. That
they broke their covenant with God is abundantly clear,
and therefore, their claim to God’s promises has no more
validity than Esau’s claim to his father’s estate. And
why would God reconstruct a covenant that was inadequate
when He has already provided a new and better covenant
established on better promises. The Bible is absolutely
clear in stating, who the heirs of God ARE. It is
equally clear and definite in showing us who the heirs
are NOT.
Chapter
Three
THE
ORIGIN OF THE JEWS...
In view of
the prevalent teaching in many quarters claiming that
the Jews are in a unique sense, “God’s Chosen People,”
let us scrutinize God’s covenant with Abraham very
carefully. The Bible tells us that Abraham was a SYRIAN
by nationality. Although this may come as a surprise to
some, it is recorded in Deut. 26:5 as follows: “And thou
shalt speak and say before the Lord thy God, A SYRIAN
ready to perish was my father and he went down to
Egypt…” Historically Abraham is probably one of the most
influential men who ever lived. Two of the world’s great
races and three of the world’s leading religions trace
their origin to Abraham.
The Arabs
trace their ancestry to Abraham through Ishmael while
the Hebrew lineage goes back through Issac to Abraham,
their father. The Arabs revere the memory of Mohammed,
the founder of the Islamic or Moslem religion and the
tomb of Abraham is one of their most sacred shrines.
Incidentally the word, “Islam,” means “Submission to
God’s will,” while Moslem, which is sometimes spelled
Muslim, means “A true believer, or to resign oneself to
God.” These religious overtones help to explain the
fanatical hostility separating Arabs and Jews. Each
claims to be God’s Chosen race with a Divine mission and
each claims Abraham as his forefather.
It is
scarcely necessary to call attention to the importance,
which Abraham plays in Hebrew literature and worship for
both their race and their monotheistic religion owe
their origin to Abraham. Christians acknowledge their
great spiritual debt to Abraham but they accept the
teaching of Paul that God did not make His covenant with
Abraham alone, but with Abraham and his Seed, which is
Christ. Gal. 3:16. The focal point to notice here is
that the Arabs and the Jews as well as the Christians
can claim priority with Abraham according to the flesh,
but the Bible explicitly denies any merit from this
source. The sum total of Scriptural condemnation of this
fallacy is categorically stated in 2 Cor. 5:16,
“Wherefore, henceforth know we NO MAN after the flesh,
yea though we HAVE KNOW CHRIST after the flesh, yet now
henceforth, know we Him no more.” This statement alone
is sufficient to topple the prestigious claims of
British Israelites, Mormons, Judaizers, Arabs or any
other religious body that builds upon racial or fleshly
partiality. “God is no respecter of persons.” Acts
10:34. Inasmuch as, this profound utterance, was made by
Peter, who was the acknowledged apostle to the
circumcision (the Jews), and since it was made to a
congregation that was pre-dominantly Gentiles, it
carries the weight of authority. Paul agrees
wholeheartedly with Peter thus: “Is He the God of the
Jews only? Is He not also of the Gentiles? YEA, of the
Gentiles also.” Rom. 3:29.
What does it
mean to know Christ after the flesh and why is this
inadequate? To know Christ only as a fact in history, or
to see Him only as a teacher, an example, a moralist or
as a founder of a superior cult finds its origin in the
flesh and differs only in degree from any other great
religious leader in mankind. Knowing Christ by faith
transcends all philosophies and enthrones Him as a fact
of the heat of mankind. Christ did not come to establish
a superior cult for our intellects to boast about, but
rather to effect a transformed life which is the
culmination of Abraham’s faith which is God’s ultimate
plan to redeem the soul and reconcile man to God. This
is what Jesus meant when He said, “Your father Abraham
rejoiced to see My day, and he saw it and was glad.”
John 8:36. Abraham’s faith envisioned redemption from
sin.
Let us now
consider the origin of the terms, Hebrew, Israelite and
Jew. Abraham is called the Hebrew in Gen. 14:13. It
means, “The other side, or to cross over.” It refers to
Abraham’s trek from Chaldea to Canaan and his crossing
the Euphrates River en route. Israel was the name given
to Jacob after his encounter with the heavenly Being who
wrestled all night with Jacob. It means a Prince, or
ruling with God, but it includes the idea of striving
with God and prevailing. It is perhaps the most
cherished name designating the Hebrew people.
What does
the Bible say about the Jews? Some may be surprised to
discover the term Jew is only mentioned ten times in the
Old Testament while the plural form Jews is used just
some sixty-four times. More than half of these are found
in Esther. This may not seem important except that Jews
are mentioned nearly 200 times in the New Testament.
Israel is mentioned almost 2,500 times in the Old
Testament but only seventy-three times in the New.
Originally the term Jew meant a descendant of Judah. In
2 Kings 6:16 it is applied to the two tribes which
remained loyal to the kingdom. In later days it included
the twelve tribes. (Young’s Analytical Concordance) The
Bible always refers to the twelve tribes and never
countenances the so-called ten lost tribes.
When we
speak about the Jews we should be careful to explain
whether we mean the Jewish people or the Jews’ religion.
The writer has known many Jewish merchants whose honesty
in business is flawless. Their sons have given world
leadership in law, science, art, music, medicine and
politics and in many other ways. But race and religion
are not identical. Thus while we may glow with
justifiable pride about Britain’s history and her
heroes, we may not take the same satisfaction from her
present politics or even her morals. The same rule
applies to any analysis of the Jews, or for that matter
of any nation under examination. The roots of
Christianity and Judaism are closely entwined in many
respects in origin but they travel divergent paths
through history. In order to explain this difference it
will be necessary to trace the successive steps, which
produced Christendom in the light of God’s
Word.


|